The rapidly expanding use of smartphone-app-enabled ride sharing, or transportation network company (TNC), services such as Uber and Lyft raised public policy issues affecting insurers offering private passenger auto insurance products, ride-sharing drivers, passengers, and the public.
Significant issues include a potential gap in coverage between the commercial auto coverage provided by TNCs and the personal auto coverage purchased by a driver, a lack of knowledge on the part of drivers regarding their insurance coverage, and duties to share information following an accident. The insurance industry position has been that the driver is engaged in commercial activity as soon as he/she has logged on to the app or has made himself/herself available to be matched up with a passenger. TNCs initially held that commercial activity does not begin until the passenger enters the vehicle or has been matched with a rider.
In NAMIC’s view, any ride-sharing public policy measures should recognize the distinction between commercial and personal insurance exposure risk. As such, public policy measures should recognize that a driver is engaged in commercial activity as soon as he/she has logged in to the TNC system or is available to be matched with a passenger.
Measures should also recognize that insurers innovate and compete by developing new products for the market and should therefore not prevent insurers from developing products specifically aimed at developing technologies and related activities. On the other hand, any new coverages that may be developed should not be mandated but rather should be provided only on a voluntary basis with underwriting and rating freedom.
NAMIC believes that measures to promote awareness of coverage gaps among potential drivers and passengers are appropriate, and supports of the NCOIL TNC Model Act, a compromise agreement between the TNC industry and the insurance industry.
January 21, 2020 HB 1731, Electric Foot Scooters, has been introduced. The proposed legislation states... Read more
May 9, 2019 The Florida Legislature adjourned on May 4, and the insurance industry came away with more than just a big win on the assignment-of-benefits reform that passed April 24. HB 7065 has an... Read more
April 26, 2019 With only one week left in the 2019 Florida legislative session, House and Senate floor activity has... Read more
April 26, 2019 Senate File 412, to protect consumers from the abusive assignment of benefit practices seen in many states, passed both chambers of the Iowa Legislature without a... Read more
April 17, 2019 The New York Department of Financial Services has issued Insurance Circular Letters No. 3 (2019) regarding, respectively, the settlement of controversies between no-fault insurers and compensation providers pursuant to the intercompany loss transfer... Read more